Anyone converted a harptail Starfire to a stop tail?

MojoTooth

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
2,002
Reaction score
1
Played guitar last with a buddy of mine who has a 63 Gisbon 335. Great guitar but I still prefer my 69 SFIV with the mini's. He even admitted that he preferred the tone of mine, but felt it would really push it over the top to add a stop tail to it rather than the harp tail. I've always heard that at least with 335's the stop tail was more desireable than the trapeze.

Has anone ever successfully converted a harp tail SFIV to a stop tail, can it be done and is it worth making this change tonewise or to make the guitar sustain more?
 

GAD

Reverential Morlock
Über-Morlock
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
23,176
Reaction score
18,905
Location
NJ (The nice part)
Guild Total
112
That is not a change I would make, and I love stop tails.

Harp tails are classy, and the tone on those old Starfire KILLS. Don't let some Gibson lover push you into mangling that beautiful guitar.

IMO the Trapese is ugly. The Harp tailpiece is elegant. I think the only thing you'll gain by drilling holes in the top of your guitar is devaluing it by $500 or more.
 

Kslam

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
486
Reaction score
0
Location
New York City
I'm pretty sure your membership from Let's Talk Guild will be revoked if you put a stop tail on a 69 SFIV!
 

MojoTooth

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
2,002
Reaction score
1
Kslam said:
I'm pretty sure your membership from Let's Talk Guild will be revoked if you put a stop tail on a 69 SFIV!
:lol:
as many times as I have been reprimanded, leave it to me to get banned for making a modification to my guitar! :lol:
 

AlohaJoe

Senior Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
2,967
Reaction score
2
Location
Ecotopia
MojoTooth said:
Played guitar last with a buddy ... he preferred the tone of mine, but felt it would really push it over the top to add a stop tail to it rather than the harp tail
This man is NOT your friend! He is trying to trick you into mangling a perfectly good guitar because he is jealous of the lovely Guildness of your tone. Don't fall for it! :lol:

But seriously folks... a stop tail on a guitar that wasn't designed for one? Do you want it to explode? :shock:
 

MojoTooth

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
2,002
Reaction score
1
how was it not designed for one? help me understand that. I always wondered why Gibson went to the trapeze from the stoptail in the 60's. i prefer the look of the harp and/or the trapeze myself.
 

iismet

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I agree - there should be no structural reason you could not convert that guitar to a stop. There is no possible way I would if it were mine. Fitted with a harp, they are works of art. You could easily pick up a newer one. You guy's that have those are very fortunate.
 

GAD

Reverential Morlock
Über-Morlock
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
23,176
Reaction score
18,905
Location
NJ (The nice part)
Guild Total
112
Perhaps by "not designed" he meant "not intended".

The idea of drilling a couple of 1/2 holes in the top of that beautiful vintage instrument should be enough to deter you. If that doesn't do it, imagine the next step of hammering the bushings for the studs into those new holes.

I would wonder if, since the stop tail was never intended for that guitar, if maybe the center block is thicker in the stop-tail models... If the center block isn't wide enough, then you'd have a useless hole in the top of your Starfire.

Don't do it man. If you want a stop tail, find a late-80s or early 90s Starfire. It will have a stop tail and come with HB1s (though not minis). Most of them have the 1 5/8" neck too, so it would be more like the one you have.

For me, putting a stop tail on that guitar would be just as bad as putting a Floyd Rose on it. It just wasn't meant to be.

A Guildsby - yeah I could see that. Couple of small screws on the bottom and you're done. That's sort of the opposite of what you asked though. :)
 

jte

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
363
Reaction score
44
Location
Central Illinois, USA
MojoTooth said:
how was it not designed for one? help me understand that. I always wondered why Gibson went to the trapeze from the stoptail in the 60's. i prefer the look of the harp and/or the trapeze myself.

The Gibson trapeze tailpiece is a pretty flimsy bit of metal compared to the harp tailpiece on the Guilds. There are several reasons the stop tailpiece is more sought after on Gibsons, and most of them don't apply to the Starfire. The reasons people want an ES-335 with the stop bar instead of the trapeze include..

A. Older is better and that's what they started with
B. The trapeze is flimsy and causes resonances and tuning instability
C. At one time Gibson shortened the interior block and there wasn't enough wood there for the stop tailpeice, so if you get one with the stop bar, you've probably got a full-length block
D. Eric Clapton's, Larry Carlton's, and Lee Ritenour's all had the stop bar, therefore it MUST be better.

Gibson switched to the trapeze because it was less expensive to install (less precision required) perhaps. But a primary reason was that if someone ordered an ES-3X5 with a Bigsby, they had to cover the holes on the face of the guitar drilled for the stop bar. So by switching to a trapeze as the standard tailpiece, instead of putting that plastic strip on the guitar that said "Custom", they didn't have anything in the way.

The Guild harp is much heavier so it eliminates the tuning instability the Gibson trapeze had, and it gives the guitar some downward pressure on the bridge that the Gibson doesn't. The Guild also terminates the strings a little bit closer to the bridge (actually a good bit closer on the treble strings) than the Gibson one does. On the Gibson the strings all end well below the F-hole, but on the Guild even the bass strings are right at the end of the F-hole.

Don't do it- it's better than a Gibson anyway! :)

No, seriously- I managed a guitar store from '77 through '88 and we were (among others) franchised dealers for both Gibson and Guild. While we sold more ES-335s than Starfires (a whole 'nother thread BTW), the Guilds were consistently very very very good guitars. The Gibson ES-335s ranged from OK and just above mediocre to very very good. In that whole time I managed the store only two ES-335s came through that were good enough to justify the reputation they had (and one was simply an exquisite electric guitar- played through a chocolate covered Fender Pro, it was THE SOUND). But every Starfire IV was as good as all but that one ES-335, and better than most 335s. That sampling includes not only new ones we sold, but ones we worked on, got used for sale, etc. every ES-335 and Starfire IV that came through the store for anything from sales to just being restrung. I'd always opt for a Starfire.

BTW, when Larry Carlton quit the LA Express and helped coach Robben Ford for the gig, they went out together to get an ES-335 for Robben. They wound up getting him a Starfire IV with the harp tailpiece.

John
 

MojoTooth

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
2,002
Reaction score
1
jte said:
MojoTooth said:
how was it not designed for one? help me understand that. I always wondered why Gibson went to the trapeze from the stoptail in the 60's. i prefer the look of the harp and/or the trapeze myself.

The Gibson trapeze tailpiece is a pretty flimsy bit of metal compared to the harp tailpiece on the Guilds. There are several reasons the stop tailpiece is more sought after on Gibsons, and most of them don't apply to the Starfire. The reasons people want an ES-335 with the stop bar instead of the trapeze include..

A. Older is better and that's what they started with
B. The trapeze is flimsy and causes resonances and tuning instability
C. At one time Gibson shortened the interior block and there wasn't enough wood there for the stop tailpeice, so if you get one with the stop bar, you've probably got a full-length block
D. Eric Clapton's, Larry Carlton's, and Lee Ritenour's all had the stop bar, therefore it MUST be better.

Gibson switched to the trapeze because it was less expensive to install (less precision required) perhaps. But a primary reason was that if someone ordered an ES-3X5 with a Bigsby, they had to cover the holes on the face of the guitar drilled for the stop bar. So by switching to a trapeze as the standard tailpiece, instead of putting that plastic strip on the guitar that said "Custom", they didn't have anything in the way.

The Guild harp is much heavier so it eliminates the tuning instability the Gibson trapeze had, and it gives the guitar some downward pressure on the bridge that the Gibson doesn't. The Guild also terminates the strings a little bit closer to the bridge (actually a good bit closer on the treble strings) than the Gibson one does. On the Gibson the strings all end well below the F-hole, but on the Guild even the bass strings are right at the end of the F-hole.

Don't do it- it's better than a Gibson anyway! :)

No, seriously- I managed a guitar store from '77 through '88 and we were (among others) franchised dealers for both Gibson and Guild. While we sold more ES-335s than Starfires (a whole 'nother thread BTW), the Guilds were consistently very very very good guitars. The Gibson ES-335s ranged from OK and just above mediocre to very very good. In that whole time I managed the store only two ES-335s came through that were good enough to justify the reputation they had (and one was simply an exquisite electric guitar- played through a chocolate covered Fender Pro, it was THE SOUND). But every Starfire IV was as good as all but that one ES-335, and better than most 335s. That sampling includes not only new ones we sold, but ones we worked on, got used for sale, etc. every ES-335 and Starfire IV that came through the store for anything from sales to just being restrung. I'd always opt for a Starfire.

BTW, when Larry Carlton quit the LA Express and helped coach Robben Ford for the gig, they went out together to get an ES-335 for Robben. They wound up getting him a Starfire IV with the harp tailpiece.

John
Hey John, thanks for the info. My buddy also said he felt Gibson moved to the trapeze because they were easier, quicker and cheaper to make than the stop tail. Cool story about Carlton and Ford. I have recently started listening to Ford and I'm enjoying his work.
 

GAD

Reverential Morlock
Über-Morlock
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
23,176
Reaction score
18,905
Location
NJ (The nice part)
Guild Total
112
Hey Mojo - check out this thread on TGP (while it lasts): http://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... p?t=893211

He's selling a '65 ES-335 with a trapeze. In post #9 he states, "My main player is a 64 335 that I've had forever. I bought this one because I thought a trap tail would be very different from a stop tail. If I put on a blindfold, I don't think I'd know the difference."

Food for thought.
 

dapmdave

Enlightened Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
24
Just step away from the power tools, mojo. Bad idea...

Dave :D
 
Top