In Your Words, Can You Describe The Tonal Differences Between Jumbo Rosewood and Maple?

HeyMikey

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
5,589
Reaction score
4,947
Location
MA
Guild Total
9
I have limited experience with jumbos but my personal preference is rosewood for smaller body guitars and maple for larger bodies.

I find the bass and sustain of rosewood really enhances the lack of natural low end in a small guitar and rounds out the sound.

In a large body I find that same rosewood sustain and bass can become overwhelming and muddy the sound, especially on faster changes.

For me maple has not been a good wood for small bodies. The quick decay and brightness do nothing to augment the smaller body lack of bass. If you are a speed demon it can be beneficial, but otherwise I just don’t dig it.

However that same maple brightness and crispness helps reduce muddiness in a large body, and in the case of Guild archbacks still provides plenty of punchy low end.

In between mahogany seems like it works very well with any size though may not always outperform a good small rosewood or large maple.
 
Last edited:

kitniyatran

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
3,394
Reaction score
506
Location
SW Fl.
In a stage or studio situation it's easier to avoid feedback with mahogany or Maple back, and also rosewood may as others said come across as somewhat muddy , where Maple and mahogany will have more clarity.
In the original Kentucky Colonels, when Clarence White was going to play a solo he would switch from his D28 to a D18 until it was stolen, Because the mahogany D18 cut through for the solo work whereas the rosewood D 28 has the boom for the Bluegrass rhythm.
 
Last edited:

General Dreedle

Junior Member
Joined
May 23, 2019
Messages
99
Reaction score
57
To the point made earlier about small bodied maples, I have this exact Gibson Nick Lucas, got it used at a deep discount because it had a finish defect no one could see, but has a deep lower bout. Note; I can't play as well as this guy, but this small bodied maple is a fantastic guitar that doesn't sound small or thin at all. I also have a JF 30 that's an excellent fingerpicking guitar and strumming
 

plaidseason

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
1,438
Reaction score
844
Location
Southern New England Coast, USA
To the point made earlier about small bodied maples, I have this exact Gibson Nick Lucas, got it used at a deep discount because it had a finish defect no one could see, but has a deep lower bout. Note; I can't play as well as this guy, but this small bodied maple is a fantastic guitar that doesn't sound small or thin at all. I also have a JF 30 that's an excellent fingerpicking guitar and strumming

Add to this that many of those beloved banner Gibson J45s are maple back and sides.
 
Top