Is it me or is that thing a bit lop-sided?
People are not symmetrical!Is it me or is that thing a bit lop-sided?
Is it me or is that thing a bit lop-sided?
Just figured it out: the flatter side's where she habitually carries her cellphone.Needs a buttock lift, but I don't think many luthiers do that procedure...
walrus
.
It'd be interesting to hear how it sounds, or how it would sound once made of good all solid woods. After all it seems like in this world a lot of what is done, comes from copying what has been made by some renown pioneers...Therefore you'll get OMs, 000s or 00s, Dreads or Jumbos, Grand Auditoriums and so on...Are we really sure they actually are the best possibly sounding formats ?
I know what I'd call it... . That sure is funny, GG!
A Kora, I saw these masters of the instrument on the Pyramid stage at Glastonbury
My memory is fading but I think that was also based on a gourd as the resonating chamber.
That's @bluesypicky trying to figure it out.
I remember that when Ovation guitars were beginning to be the big thing (around the mid 70s I think here), I read that their back shape allowed a better projection than ordinary flat backs, mentioning lutes as an example : they said that if it wasn't for the cost of carving a round back from all solid wood, it would be used much of the time...So in that case it's the actual features of a round back and their very acoustic qualities that made those shapes were chosen (both for lutes or Ovation guitars).There are two distinct things to consider. One is the case where the goal is to make a musical instrument that is in some sense optimal. For things like guitar and violin family instruments there are centuries of experience in both design and building techniques and innovation is likely to be incremental. The other case is where the goal is to make a functional musical instrument from the materials at hand. So the point of using the coco de mer as a component is more about using available materials than it is about finding a good sounding instrument.
I read that their back shape allowed a better projection than ordinary flat backs,