x500 or x175

dallasblues

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Location
Dallas, TX
To my eyes (although I've yet to see or play one in person), the Guild x500 and x175 appear to be very similar. I understand that the x500 is a carved top, while the x175 is laminate. Is this correct? How do these guitars differ tonally?
 

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,123
Reaction score
6,750
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
dallasblues said:
To my eyes (although I've yet to see or play one in person), the Guild x500 and x175 appear to be very similar. I understand that the x500 is a carved top, while the x175 is laminate. Is this correct? How do these guitars differ tonally?

As far as I know, they're both laminated tops DB. Others with more knowledge may chime in here. They're similar, but the X500 has quite a bit more bling than the X175. Gold hardware, block and abalone inlays, and an ebony fretboard with "railroad tracks" on the edges. There may be more, too. I think that the X175 is the sweet spot of Guild's archtop line, with a big bonus if you can find a nice Hoboken like mine. 8)
 

AlohaJoe

Senior Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
2,967
Reaction score
2
Location
Ecotopia
I think Sandy's right, it's mostly a bling thing, the X-500s are laminates but you gain X-700 style appointments like gold hardware, fancier neck inlays, additional binding on the neck and headstock and a master volume. Here's a '68 Westerly X175B (I was a hair's breadth away from and foolishly let slip away) and a '75 X-500.

68x175_.jpg
75x500_.jpg


Some details may have changed through the years as well.

Pics source:
archtop.com
 

rwmol

Junior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Location
Washington, Utah
I don't think so. If you're interested in a X175, I have a 1980 Manhattan that I'm willing to "Wheel and Deal" on.

Randy
 

Walter Broes

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
5,931
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Antwerp, Belgium
The 500 has the maple neck, more binding, and gold hardware, otherwise they're the same. No solid top on an X500.
 

mad dog

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
1,269
Reaction score
240
Location
Montclair, NJ
Two great hollowbody electric Guilds IMO. Played a mid-70s X-175 several times and wanted it bad. Then found one of the last Westerly built X-500s this year. They are quite similar in all ways. The most notable difference between those two was the vintage Guild pickups on the X-175. Superior jazz tones, plus a great, worn in and comfortable feel on that guitar.

They feel much the same, but have to say the 2001 X-500 is the best-playing big body electric I've ever tried. Effortless action. The acoustic volume on the X-500 is excellent too, louder than the X-175.
MD
 

hansmoust

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
9,229
Reaction score
3,589
Location
Netherlands
Darryl Hattenhauer said:
Hans says a few X500s had soundposts. I don't know if any X175s did.

Yes, but by the time soundposts were introduced on the X-500, the X-175 was no longer part of the Guild line.

Sincerely,

Hans Moust
www.guitarsgalore.nl
 

dallasblues

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Location
Dallas, TX
Thanks for the info! I've just recently started looking into Guild archtops. I'm especially interested in the big body models like these two.

To Hans... I recently bought your book about Guilds. I love it! Thanks for putting that together for all of us.
 
Top