GF-60 (Maple) and G-45 ?

Nid2007

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
34
Reaction score
4
Hi,
I stumbled upon a 1980's Hank Williams Jr model G-45 over the weekend and was smitten. I'm primarily a Gibson acoustic guy and generally gravitate toward lighter weight acoustics. This G-45 is tank, but the ebony fretboard felt really good in the hand and this dread resonated and played like a great J-200.

In the $2000 plus area, it was more than I wanted to pay on a whim, and I definitely didn't want to pay extra for any cost associated it with it being a signature model (I'm not seeking a Hank Jr. sig).

I was wondering if anyone had any experience with this guitar as compared to GF-60 (maple) from the late 80's. I found one available, also with a maple bound neck with ebony board. It is priced a little better and I am wondering if what I found appealing in the Hank Jr (ebony fretboard/maple neck playability combined with really nice sustain for a maple body) would be there in a good GF-60.

Thanks for any insight.
 

GardMan

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
5,359
Reaction score
959
Location
Utah
Guild Total
5
Hey Nid2007,
I don't have any experience with the GF-60... but if you aren't wedded to an ebony fretboard and bling of the G-45, and are looking for similar sound for less $$$, consider a D-30. The D-30 is a maple dread with arched maple back, spruce top with scalloped bracing, very much like the G-45 Hank Williams. But it has a rosewood fretboard and dot makers. They're usually relatively abundant on eBay and Reverb, and a nice one can be found for half (or less) the cost of a G-45.

Another one to look at would be the G-37 (predecessor of the D-30), made from ~1973-86. Again, maple body dread with arched back, spruce top with straight (unscalloped) braces, rosewood fretboard with dot markers. Early ones had one-piece mahogany necks and silk screened logo. Later, a multipiece maple neck and Chesterfield logo. Early G-37s can be had in VG condition for as little as $600, and later ones up to around $1K.

Don't know exactly what they were asking for the G-45... but there probably wasn't much of an "upcharge" for it being a signature model. It's pretty typical for limited edition Guilds of this trim level to sell in the $2-$3K range. There was a very similar limited edition model, the D-65S, with maple body, arched back, and the neck of a D-55 (ebony with abalone wedges in pearl block fret markers)...only ~20 made, and I think the last one I saw was in the $3K range.

Happy hunting!
 
Last edited:

richardp69

Enlightened Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
6,007
Reaction score
5,965
Location
Barton City, Michigan
I do have a '83 G 45 (not Hank Williams Jr. model) and I think it is a pretty exceptional Guild. I paid more than the $2k you mentioned and possibly overpaid a bit but I've learned not to let $200 or $300 swing my decision too much. Sure, I'd like to get all my guitars for free but I don't mind paying to get something I really lust for.
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,789
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
Hi,
I stumbled upon a 1980's Hank Williams Jr model G-45 over the weekend and was smitten. I'm primarily a Gibson acoustic guy and generally gravitate toward lighter weight acoustics. This G-45 is tank, but the ebony fretboard felt really good in the hand and this dread resonated and played like a great J-200.

In the $2000 plus area, it was more than I wanted to pay on a whim, and I definitely didn't want to pay extra for any cost associated it with it being a signature model (I'm not seeking a Hank Jr. sig).

I was wondering if anyone had any experience with this guitar as compared to GF-60 (maple) from the late 80's. I found one available, also with a maple bound neck with ebony board. It is priced a little better and I am wondering if what I found appealing in the Hank Jr (ebony fretboard/maple neck playability combined with really nice sustain for a maple body) would be there in a good GF-60.

Thanks for any insight.
Think that G45 was overpriced, even if a Hank Williams model
The G45 was a dreadnought, the GF60 was a "Grand Auditorium", 16" lower bout "F body", flatback, and definitely upscale model from the G45.
http://www.westerlyguildguitars.com/guitars/gf60.html
Note the price difference between the GF60 and the D30 the Hank Williams was based on:
http://www.westerlyguildguitars.com/guitars/gf60.html
And with Guild they don't just bling up a guitar to get more for it, they save the bling for the guitars that deserve it, and in general as the price goes up so does the sound quality.
It's kind of like comparing apples to oranges but that GF60 is the real counterpart to an SJ200.
My F65ce's based on the same outline but is shallow and arched back, and it still gives up very little to my dreadnoughts, in fact for quite a while it was actually just as loud as my D40 (flatbacked 'hog body dread) until that one finally opened up.
If you're going to record I say go with the flatback.
Ya just gotta try it and decide for yourself, especially when it comes to the neck because that G45 might have been built at a time when Guild tended to have thicker (deeper not wider) necks.
By the time the GF60's came out they were getting thinner and builds in general were getting lighter.
GF60's had the benefit of George Gruhn/Kim Walker design and build DNA.
 

Nid2007

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
34
Reaction score
4
Thanks for the info everyone. Very helpful, especially as to pricing. I definitely was not looking to like the G45 as much as I did. I prefer slope shouldered dreads, I usually think maple is too bright, generally prefer lighter guitars, and I usually steer clear from a neck as slim as the maple neck on the G-45. But something about that guitar...

Anyone have thoughts or experience with the D-44M? One is avail for less than half the price of the G45.
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,789
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
Thanks for the info everyone. Very helpful, especially as to pricing. I definitely was not looking to like the G45 as much as I did. I prefer slope shouldered dreads, I usually think maple is too bright, generally prefer lighter guitars, and I usually steer clear from a neck as slim as the maple neck on the G-45. But something about that guitar...

Anyone have thoughts or experience with the D-44M? One is avail for less than half the price of the G45.

Pretty sure it was their first maple dread, had a flat back.
Assuming good overall condition with a case, sounds like a good price.
I based my earlier comment about recording characteristics on my experience with my hog body dreads:
The archback D25 produces more distortion than the flatback D40 when recording, and they're essentially identical build formulas except for the back configuration.
And while I love my F65ce, I was noticing it was extremely jangly in recording on my GF's cell phone, even though not that jangly to me from the playing position.
I think a flatback would reduce the jangliness, but what I really wanted was a woodier recorded tone and finally accomplished that with a set of silk'n'steels tuned a whole step down.
Can't see any reason it wouldn't give a D44m or either of the other 2 a new voice, too.
In case you also like to experiment with strings.
As for the previously mentioned D30, I think that one's also well worth your consideration.
Have a buddy with its earlier iteration, the G37, and that was the single best sounding acoustic guitar I've ever heard in my life.
Sustain "forever", and that's really not too far from the truth according to several owners of that model and D30's, here.

Final thought re "something about that guitar...".
There's lots of guys here who'd say "Get the one that speaks to you".
'cause we hear at least 3 or 4 stories every year from new members who're trying to scratch the itch left by the one they didn't buy.
:friendly_wink:
 

Nid2007

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
34
Reaction score
4
Thanks. There is a 1990 D-30 avail for around 1k; maybe that's the ticket. But like you said, the "something" about the G45 is sticking in my head.
 

Nid2007

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
34
Reaction score
4
Doing some research, I see I can get a 1985 G-37 for about half the price of the 1985 G-45 HW. I don't care about the fret marker bling, but I really liked the feel of the G-45 neck fretboard. It may be in part because the hard hard ebony on the G-45 is so different from the rosewood board on my Gibson's. But it could have also been the maple neck, which the 1985 G-37 also has.

Am I correct in thinking that the 1985 G-37 should be pretty much the same guitar as the 1985 G45 HW--the only difference being the blingy ebony fretboard vs the plain rosewood fretboard on the G-37?

Thanks!
 

Bonneville88

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
2,695
Reaction score
1,255
Location
St. Louis, MO
Guild Total
40
"Pretty much the same guitar" - NO.

Not even close - they're completely different animals, have owned several of both.

Advice - find a good D30 and run with it. Decent player-grade with some wear but good
neck angle can be had for $650 - $750ish, excellent examples $900 - $1100.
G37s are interesting but not as user friendly as D30s.

Agreed though, G45 HW's are cool!
 

GardMan

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
5,359
Reaction score
959
Location
Utah
Guild Total
5
Re: your comments on the "feel" of the neck... You should be aware that during thru the Hoboken and Westerly years (and even Corona?), Guild necks were shaped and finished by HAND. A template was used to guide in shaping, but the overall shape of the neck can vary considerably from guitar to guitar, within the same model, within the same year, and MAYBE even within the same batch. Even nut width can vary from the standard spec of 1-11/16". For example, my '76 D-50 had a narrow but thick neck, my '92 D-55 had a standard 1-11/16 width but was very thin front to back, while all three of my DV-7Xs from '94 and '95 have nut widths within 0.01" of 1-3/4", even tho' the spec is 1-11/16", and the "thickness" back to front of the DV necks varies.

So, just because you loved the neck of one '85 G-45 doesn't mean you'll love the neck of the next one that comes along.

(of the 11 Guild necks I have owned thru the years, there were only two that I never really felt comfortable with... a '78 D-35 that started out thin but got abruptly thicker at ~the 6th fret, and my '76 D-50, that was narrow and fat...)
 

GF60

Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
128
Reaction score
76
Location
Central Ohio
Guild Total
1


Here is my Maple GF-60, bought new in 1988. It is an outstanding guitar. It does have an ebony fret board and bridge. Mine does not have maple binding at all. It is plastic or boltaron or whatever was used in those days. It has aged to a nice creamy color though. I have never played a G-45, but I can't imagine it being better than mine. Then again I have not been much of a fan of maple dreads.
 
Last edited:

Bonneville88

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
2,695
Reaction score
1,255
Location
St. Louis, MO
Guild Total
40
Beautiful! As I understand it, my F44 is essentially an earlier version of
your GF-60.

qHyNSpA.jpg
 
Last edited:

GF60

Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
128
Reaction score
76
Location
Central Ohio
Guild Total
1
Bonneville88,
They are very similar. What year is yours? Do the diamond fret board inlays look to be larger on the F-44? What is the width of the lower bout? I have only seen pictures of the F-44. Is that your guitar?
 
Last edited:

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,789
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
Bonneville88,
They are very similar. What year is yours? Do the diamond fret board inlays look to be larger on the F-44? What is the width of the lower bout? I have only seen pictures of the F-44. Is that your guitar?

Apologies for butt-inski, but those questions got covered recently in another thread so pretty sure my memory's accurate, that yes, the F44's had larger inlays, and for sure the lower bout is spec'd at 16" wide on both models.
The 16" lower bout F-body is the original F-40 spec, and has become my favorite Guild body size, thus my interest in these 2 models you're asking about.
:friendly_wink:
 

Bonneville88

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
2,695
Reaction score
1,255
Location
St. Louis, MO
Guild Total
40
GF60,

Thanks for asking - I'm the current owner, serial is KH100231,
the neck block bevel stamp reads MAY 21 1986.

Width of lower bout at its widest point - just measured at 16 1/16".

The inlays do appear to be larger then the GF60 and the tuners are
different as well. The jumbo frets to my knowledge are original,
the guitar plays like butter.

The wood on the back and sides is striking - have been looking for
another F44 with similar patterns for some time now, have seen a
number of gorgeous instruments but haven't seen any wood thus far
quite like this one.

Thanks FNG!

Posting several additional photos...

xQUKbTMh.jpg


YgypFEw.jpg




bFfKGaZ.jpg


sx5B2F9.jpg
 
Last edited:

Bonneville88

Senior Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
2,695
Reaction score
1,255
Location
St. Louis, MO
Guild Total
40
TX, we're on the same page - I send a PM to the OP as soon as I saw Kat's ad last night,
hopefully he can check it out:wink:
 

GF60

Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
128
Reaction score
76
Location
Central Ohio
Guild Total
1
Bonneville88,
The back on your guitar is certainly attractive. As to the tuners, I don't remember what the originals were. Only that they were gold and looked similar to what is on yours. Several years ago I was complaining about the gold wearing off. Hans Moust contacted me and offered to swap tuners as he would like to have them for another guitar. The tuners he sent were Grover Rotomatics which worked well, but after a few years they also started to wear. Which is the reason I don't care for gold tuners. Those are on the guitar in the picture I posted. I finally replaced those with nickle Grover Sta-tites. That's what is on my avatar. They function well and cosmetically I like them much better.

My GF-60 is one of the nicest Guilds I have played. I imagine your F-44 would be similar. :smile-new:
 
Top