97 starfire 2 bass

Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I would like to get more tonal variation out of my tone controls instead of adjusting my EQ on my amp all the time. Any one have suggestions on how to modify the original existing electronics to achieve this?
 

mellowgerman

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
4,146
Reaction score
1,582
Location
Orlando, FL
A couple of Alembic Superfilters should do the trick :mrgreen:

JackCasadyStarfire1.jpg


but on a more serious and realistic note, perhaps something in this direction: http://www.noll-electronic.de/sites_e/tcm_3pm.html
 

hieronymous

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2007
Messages
431
Reaction score
158
Location
Northern CA
Guild Total
1
What kind of adjustments are you making at the amp? What kind of sounds are you going for?
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I was thinking of something modified onboard. For example, when i adjust the tone controls there is very little change in tone. My acoustic electric martin and modulus have way more tonal variation. Maybe because they are active and my guild is passive?
 

fronobulax

Bassist, GAD and the Hot Mess Mods
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
24,799
Reaction score
8,931
Location
Central Virginia, USA
Guild Total
5
zbassman said:
I was thinking of something modified onboard. For example, when i adjust the tone controls there is very little change in tone. My acoustic electric martin and modulus have way more tonal variation. Maybe because they are active and my guild is passive?

I'd say yes - active vs. passive.

My JS II which has Guild humbuckers which I assume are similar, pretty much produces one 'sound'. If I don't want that sound I generally grab another bass instead. I have found that using rounds rather than flats gives some more variation to that one sound but there are definitely limits.

The Bisonic in my Starfire has enough variation that I would not call it just one sound, although it still might be less than what you want.

As much as it pains me to suggest it, I wonder of a Pilot, with active electronics, might be the best Guild bass for you. Maybe one of the Pilot experts (Grot, krysh?) will chime in since they also have vintage Starfires.
 

mgod

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
568
Reaction score
237
Location
Los Angeles
zbassman said:
I would like to get more tonal variation out of my tone controls instead of adjusting my EQ on my amp all the time. Any one have suggestions on how to modify the original existing electronics to achieve this?
It might be worth noting that our progenitor, Mr. Casady, went from lots of controls onboard to almost none. Ultimately there's more tone control in hands and choice of instruments than in electronics.
 

mellowgerman

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
4,146
Reaction score
1,582
Location
Orlando, FL
mgod said:
zbassman said:
I would like to get more tonal variation out of my tone controls instead of adjusting my EQ on my amp all the time. Any one have suggestions on how to modify the original existing electronics to achieve this?
It might be worth noting that our progenitor, Mr. Casady, went from lots of controls onboard to almost none. Ultimately there's more tone control in hands and choice of instruments than in electronics.

This is an interesting point and I think you're absolutely right to put a significant amount of emphasis on the players touch contributing to the tone.
However, when thinking about the evolution of Jack's setup and sound, I think it's also worth considering the musical context (Hot Tuna now, versus the Airplane in 68). Also, although his bass has gotten simpler, he does now generally use an Aguilar DB 680, a DB 728, and a Bass Pod XT Pro, which arguably is more complex in tone shaping than his amps back in the day, right?
 

Happy Face

Justified Ancient of MuMu
Joined
Dec 11, 2007
Messages
926
Reaction score
248
mgod, please recount the great story and lesson we all should be reminded of now & then. Well, at least me!

(On another topic, hope you saw the Cash tribute talk in the latest Rollng Stone.)
 

mgod

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
568
Reaction score
237
Location
Los Angeles
Happy Face said:
mgod, please recount the great story and lesson we all should be reminded of now & then. Well, at least me!

(On another topic, hope you saw the Cash tribute talk in the latest Rollng Stone.)
Hell no, I hate typing that much.

And no, I didn't - Rolling Stone? All I find in there any more is Matt Taibbi. I'll have it search it online.
 

mgod

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
568
Reaction score
237
Location
Los Angeles
mellowgerman said:
mgod said:
zbassman said:
I would like to get more tonal variation out of my tone controls instead of adjusting my EQ on my amp all the time. Any one have suggestions on how to modify the original existing electronics to achieve this?
It might be worth noting that our progenitor, Mr. Casady, went from lots of controls onboard to almost none. Ultimately there's more tone control in hands and choice of instruments than in electronics.

This is an interesting point and I think you're absolutely right to put a significant amount of emphasis on the players touch contributing to the tone.
However, when thinking about the evolution of Jack's setup and sound, I think it's also worth considering the musical context (Hot Tuna now, versus the Airplane in 68). Also, although his bass has gotten simpler, he does now generally use an Aguilar DB 680, a DB 728, and a Bass Pod XT Pro, which arguably is more complex in tone shaping than his amps back in the day, right?
No, I disagree completely. My guess is he uses a Bas Pod (horrors!) for fuzz and effects. But his basic tone would still be mostly hands, not Aguilar.
 
Top