Changes Over The Years

richardp69

Enlightened Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
6,034
Reaction score
6,065
Location
Barton City, Michigan
I've been around guitars since 1961 or so. I went in spurts spending a lot of time with them at times and other times pretty much none at all. When I was working, it was pretty much 12 hour days or more so that's where most of my efforts went.

When I retired in 2004 I started buying and playing in earnest. I didn't get much better skill wise but I was much happier. My first preference was always a nice RW guitar followed by Mahogany as a distant 2nd and then the not at all (at the time) favored and actually dreaded Maple. I know there are many more tonewoods out there but those three was where I concentrated at the time.

Fast forward to today. Maple is by far my favorite at this point. I love the clarity and crispness of a nice Maple guitar. If you add to that an arched back you get that thump and growl I adore. A very close 2nd now is Mahogany. Although I do appreciate a quality RW guitar it is now in 3rd place on my list. I've also gotten heavily into exotic woods with Custom Builder Richie Crowder.

Nothing of great import here, I just find it interesting how my tastes have changed over the years. What prompted my thinking was when I pulled out a guitar I hadn't played in a few years. It is one of my all-time favorite Guild models, the D 40.

This D 40 is a bit different. I bought it new at Sweetwater. Although I seldom buy new, this was a limited run of something like 25 guitars. Sweetwater called it a GSR but it really was not. It's the D 40T Deluxe. As you can see it has the fancier appointments than the typical D 40. It likely doesn't sound any better than my other D 40T but I do like the look. (ya'll may or may not).

I shared pics when I 1st bought it but here they are again. It was raining all night and so far today so the lighting isn't great but I think you can see them ok
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0566.JPG
    DSCN0566.JPG
    374.6 KB · Views: 60
  • DSCN0567.JPG
    DSCN0567.JPG
    441.1 KB · Views: 49
  • DSCN0568.JPG
    DSCN0568.JPG
    314.8 KB · Views: 48
  • DSCN0569.JPG
    DSCN0569.JPG
    277.5 KB · Views: 47
  • DSCN0570.JPG
    DSCN0570.JPG
    540.9 KB · Views: 47
  • DSCN0572.JPG
    DSCN0572.JPG
    224.9 KB · Views: 46
  • DSCN0574.JPG
    DSCN0574.JPG
    190.9 KB · Views: 48
  • DSCN0575.JPG
    DSCN0575.JPG
    290.3 KB · Views: 49

twocorgis

Venerated Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
14,149
Reaction score
6,779
Location
Lawn Guyland
Guild Total
18
A D40T by any other name! I like mine so much that I've put a LR Baggs Anthem in it, and am going to tackle a few open mikes with my girl singing, if she get up the nerve.

I was always a rosewood guy until I found out that I generally like mahogany better.
 

GGJaguar

Reverential Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
21,989
Reaction score
32,368
Location
Skylands
Guild Total
50
Nice! I think it would have been better with a regular burst pattern on the top instead of the tear-drop burst, but block inlays make up for it. :) Very cool and unique guitar, thanks for sharing!
 

NM156

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Messages
116
Reaction score
134
Guild Total
1
The difference for me is that vintage maple is not in my budget :LOL: Back when the GC acoustic rooms first opened, there was nothing better to me than strumming a maple Guild. I love the rich full tone of mahogany but maple almost adds a 12-string sound.
 

HeyMikey

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
4,895
Location
MA
Guild Total
9
I love the sound of a large maple Guild. I’m talking 16” x 5 deep or more. Especially true with an arched back. The larger body provides enough to develop a good bottom end and level of sustain, but the maple keeps them in check. You get a nice richness and punch, without it all becoming muddy.

However, I’ve found the opposite to be true on the smaller bodied maples I’ve played. Granted, that is a limited sample but in general I’m talking about OM size 15” across and/or 4 deep. I’ve never been able to bond with any I’ve tried because they’ve lacked in bass and sustain. For this size I much prefer rosewood or mahogany, or similar tone woods that accentuate more of the low end.

I’m sure there are exceptions to either of the above but these are my general findings to date.
 

Iceman

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2021
Messages
121
Reaction score
219
Location
Mid-Latitudes
Guild Total
5
That's a super nice D 40.
First Guild was D 40 in 1969.
Today, 50 years later, I prefer rosewood.
My go to guild is a D 50 CE, very mellow!
 

midnightright

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
384
Reaction score
112
Wow! What a guitar? That looks like one that I could use for just about anything -- and make me equally happy at (almost) all times. . . I've actually never technically played a D 40 (just DV 6). I love the way it sits with my voice. Seems made for me~

I've often wondered about the maple guitars as well. Though never even seen one in person. . . I bet they're pretty sweat! And kind of unique~

(it's kind of like how I've never been able to wrap my mind around what a mahogany topped-arched back guitar might sound like) / I know separately what each of those things means; but somehow, I just can't compute?

I guess that if guitars are like living & breathing things, then it only makes sense that we would evolve with them. For instance, never would I have picked up the flat back, with mahogany top D 25 from '73 as my first guitar and been happy, nor satisfied. But somehow, a small handful of years later, and it was instant bliss~
 
Top