D-25/D-35 difference

G

Guest

Unregistered
User deleted by their request
Just bought my first Guild! 1979 D-35! Love the sound and boy it looks great for its age. Local lutheir set the neck and did a bone nut/saddle replacement. I was also looking at an 81' d-25sb that had the same work done. It had the arched back and played great as well. I am inquiring about the differences between the two models. Any subtle differences? Dimentions? Are the bracing patterns the same? grade of spruce and mahogany?
 

bluesypicky

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
7,763
Reaction score
394
Location
Jupiter, FL.
Welcome to the club Nathan!!
I never had the pleasure of touching D35, so I can't compare it to the 25 but hang in there a few minutes and you will get tons of feedback from LTG'ers experienced in both models.
The 25 is a must have, regardless. :lol:
 
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
996
Reaction score
0
Location
the five-oh-nine
Hello and Welcome, Nathan! The D-25 and D-35 are very popular models hereabouts. Lots of folks here, own one or the other of these models. LTGer in good standing and all around nice guy Killdeer, actually owns both models. I'm sure he'll be along shortly with a detailed description of the differences between the two.

Cheers,

~nw
 

killdeer43

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
21,848
Reaction score
113
Location
Northwest Washington on the Salish Sea
Welcome, Nathan. You're going to like it here.
As far as your thoughts about the basic differences in the two models (bracing, wood, dimensions, etc.) I would direct you to this website:

http://westerlyguildguitars.com/index.htm

As Nigel pointed out (Hi, Nigel), I happen to have both, and as much as I like the D35 (my third), the D25 wins on all counts as far as what comes out of the guitar and that, after all, is the old bottom line.
The playability factor is similar and consistent with most Guilds, but the deep body and the arched back on the D25 project the sound like very few guitars that I've owned and/or heard.

The D25 is usually my go-to guitar and that says a lot. This bit of rambling constitutes my dos centavos. Others will be along, perhaps to wax with more eloquence about their love affairs with their own D25s....what many consider to be one of the most desirable of Guilds.

I could go on, but..... :roll:
Joe
 

bluesypicky

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
7,763
Reaction score
394
Location
Jupiter, FL.
killdeer43 said:
Others will be along, perhaps to wax with more eloquence about their love affairs with their own D25s....what many consider to be one of the most desirable of Guilds.
Joe

OK, Joe I reckon a lack in eloquence in my statement, but pretty close to your point no?:
bluesypicky said:
The 25 is a must have, regardless. :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 

taabru45

Enlightened Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
9,944
Reaction score
0
Location
Surrey, B.C.
killdeer43 said:
No, no Pascal, I was referring to others waxing with "more eloquence" than MY OWN offering. :D

Joe

Joe......again...I hate to correct you, but I've heard more than once that carnauba waxing is the best.... :lol: :wink: Steffan
 

bluesypicky

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
7,763
Reaction score
394
Location
Jupiter, FL.
killdeer43 said:
No, no Pascal, I was referring to others waxing with "more eloquence" than MY OWN offering. :D

Joe

You beat a cat to fall back up on your feet Joe....
Just messin' with you over the early brew!! (coffee that is) :lol:
 

bluesypicky

Enlightened Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
7,763
Reaction score
394
Location
Jupiter, FL.
killdeer43 said:
It's not even 5 AM here, but it's all good. :wink:
Joe

Yeah I was just thinking you're kinda late this morning.... You're gonna miss all these daybreak wild life shots (and we'll miss them in turn)!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

To our health it is!

Oh and do not worry Nathan... we'll get right back to your thread, just giving you a little veering training here.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Qvart

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
4,317
Reaction score
38
Location
Cincitucky
bluesypicky said:
Oh and do not worry Nathan... we'll get right back to your thread, just giving you a little veering training here.... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Okay, I'm working on my first cup of coffee here. Let's see if I can make coherent, if not complete, sentences. grumble grumble grumble

I was asking some questions recently about the differences because a D35 showed up here in Mr. Craig's neighborhood. The D25 has a laminate arched back and the D35 is solid 'hog flat back. I played a '70's D25 once and it sounded great, but had too many issues (lifting bridge, destroyed frets) for me to lay down the cash. The D35 on the other hand was in really good shape so I grabbed it. Haven't had a chance to test drive the two models side by side, but I say the differences are HUGE!!! and you should have one of each. Actually, that's a lie. We just like vicarious GAS-ing. ;)

Pics are mandatory! ;)

Here is a thread with some pics of bracings on different Guilds. D25 and D35 look similar. Of course there's no bracing on the arched back of the D25.

And here's the thread about the one I bought.

Enjoy, and welcome!
 

killdeer43

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
21,848
Reaction score
113
Location
Northwest Washington on the Salish Sea
bluesypicky said:
Yeah I was just thinking you're kinda late this morning.... You're gonna miss all these daybreak wild life shots (and we'll miss them in turn)!!!!
There will be no daybreak wildlife this AM, since everybody/thing is hunkered down for some pretty serious wind and heavy rain. I'll just stay close to the coffee pot for a while.

And in honor of Nathan's arrival, I'll do some A/B with the 25 & 35 this morning. :D

Joe
 

Ridgemont

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
3,352
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin TX
Hi Nathan and welcome to LTG,

I have never played a D35 so can't compare. I recently bought my D25 and love it. It really is a great all around guitar. It's projection is great when strummed hard, and also has a very pleasant tone when fingerpicked. Because I like to sit on the couch and play, I do prefer a smaller guitar for comfort reasons. However, recently the D25 is my go to guitar (over my smaller GAD 30R) due to that "opened up" mahogany bite that sounds just oh so nice. When I get another hog guitar, there is going to be some very stiff competition.
 

Qvart

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
4,317
Reaction score
38
Location
Cincitucky
killdeer43 said:
And in honor of Nathan's arrival, I'll do some A/B with the 25 & 35 this morning. :D

Yeah, I had to get the D35 out for a bit too after reading perusing this thread.

Here's a pic of the bracing in mine (nowhere near the quality of GardMan's pics - only have a cell phone with me at the moment):

0115000825.jpg



Looks like there may be more scalloping than on GarMan's D35, but his is from '72 and mine's from '83.
 

GardMan

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
5,367
Reaction score
975
Location
Utah
Guild Total
5
nathanhsc said:
I was also looking at an 81' d-25sb that had the same work done. It had the arched back and played great as well. I am inquiring about the differences between the two models. Any subtle differences? Dimentions? Are the bracing patterns the same? grade of spruce and mahogany?

I have a '72 D-35 and '74 D-25M, and at one time also had a '78 D-35 (technically my wife's, but I played it more than she did). So I was able to compare all three of them (2 D-35s and a D-25). First, a bit about construction...

The dimensions of the two models (comparing instruments from the same year) are probably the same (with some variation from instrument to instrument). Its probably important to make these comparisons within a certain time frame... as an example, my '71 D-44 and '72 D-35 are a bit smaller than my later dreads... not by much... only 1/4" - 3/8". But it is noticeable when playing them (at least to me). Those two are also significantly lighter than all my other dreads (~4.25 and ~4.5 lbs, compared to nearly 6 lbs for my D-46, D-50, and D-55). In fact, there was a very significant difference in the weights of my '72 and '78 D-35s... the '72 weighing in at ~4.5 lbs, while the '78 was probably closer to 5.5 lbs. As I recall, my D-25 comes in at the ~5.5 lb range.

The D-25 was initially introduced with a mahogany top... essentially an all mahogany version of the D-35. In the early '70s (~'73), the D-25 was given its characteristic arched back. During the transition, there were some arched back D-25s made with mahogany tops, but from ~'74 on D-25 and D-35 both have spruce tops. I believe the tops on the D-35 are sitka spruce. Someone here mentioned once that the D-25 was topped with Engelmann spruce... but I don't really know for certain. Mine certainly shows much less "grain" thru its "mahogany" stain than is visible on my D-35. (I think the D-25 reverted to flat-back 'hog top sometime in the late 90s or 00s, but I don't know when)

To my eye and camera, the top bracing pattern of the two models seem very similar... which I believe to be the "standard" Guild X-bracing. My '78 D-35 and '74 D-25 have/had an extra block/brace between the neck block and the first cross brace above the soundhole. I also think the braces on my older Guilds are a bit narrower and have a lower profile than those on my newer dreads... accounting in part for the heavier build of the later guitars. Added: of note... my '72 D-35 appears to have a maple bridge plate. The bridge plates on my '74 D-25 and '78 D-35 are/were rosewood.

Of course, the big difference between the D-35 and D-25 is the laminated, arched back of the D-25. The back itself has mahogany veneers as the outer layers, and an inner layer of ??? Hans mentioned the inner ply in these guitars might be soft maple, poplar (I think that was mentioned), or anything else on hand. I'll mention here that I also have a '74 G-37, which is essentially identical to my '74 D-25, other than it has maple sides and arched maple back. The G-37 has a very different voice than the D-25... smoother, mellower, more balanced, and not as loud.

In my experience, the D-25 and D-35 have very different voices (each of my dreads has its own unique voice!). My D-25 has a strong bass with a sort of dark, resonant quality to it. The trebles sparkle, but there is (to my ear) less emphasis on the mid ranges. When strummed, it rings forever... the sustain is incredible, and it has incredible power and projection. Mine is usually strung with JP 80/20 lights, and tuned to DADGAD most of the time... for a couple tunes I capo up 5 (or sometimes 6) frets, and it rings like a 12 string. The strong bass made balancing recordings with the D-25 a bit challenging for me... (there are examples of most of my dreads in my soundclick tunes... the D-25 is used on all several Stan Rogers tunes)

My D-35s voices are/were more balanced... particularly the '72, which I purchased new in Jan '73. The '72 is not nearly as loud... but its saddle is also getting pretty low, and its probably time to consider a neck reset. The bass is less overpowering and not as "dark sounding" as the D-25, but still very present. The mids and trebles ring thru a bit better. It has a nice bright sound for folk music that I play... it sounds great picking Freight Train, Don't Think Twice, and This Land is Your Land... but spends most of its time tuned down to CGCGCE for one tune I sing (Dougie Maclean's Caledonia). Its bright mahogany sound also make it my favorite for playing blues (or trying to, at least). It's balanced tone was easier to record than the D-25...

The (now sold) '78 D-35 was louder and more "in your face" than my '72, and had more emphasis on the mid range... Tho' its voice was different, I decided I didn't need two D-35s, and sold it (with my wife's blessing) to help pay off my D-46.

All of these tonal comparisons are VERY subjective. Really, what you need to do is sit down and A/B the two models for yourself. There are just so many variables... strings, rooms, your ear, that only you can decide for your self whether you prefer one or the other. For me, each of my dreads has a unique voice that is best suited to different suites of music. I love 'em all!

Sorry for the long-winded post (guess I don't feel like working today),
Dave
 

Qvart

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
4,317
Reaction score
38
Location
Cincitucky
Great description of the two models Dave!

GardMan said:
My D-25 has a strong bass with a sort of dark, resonant quality to it. The trebles sparkle, but there is (to my ear) less emphasis on the mid ranges. When strummed, it rings forever... the sustain is incredible, and it has incredible power and projection.

First off, the '01 DCE1 I had was basically a D4 with a cutaway (spruce top, arched laminate 'hog back), and a D4 is basically a D25 with a satin finish, so if I can count the DCE1 in the D25 family I'd agree with you - it was rather dark sounding, but not as much as the '78 I was able to test drive one day, and the mids did get a bit washed out. The highs were well-defined, sustain forever, and decent projection, but I wouldn't say more so than my D35. Of course, it's not the best comparison if we're talking about models from the '70's. The one I looked at buying projected the sound a bit more than the DCE1.

GardMan said:
My D-35s voices are/were more balanced...The '72 is not nearly as loud...The bass is less overpowering and not as "dark sounding" as the D-25, but still very present. The mids and trebles ring thru a bit better...Its bright mahogany sound also make it my favorite for playing blues (or trying to, at least). It's balanced tone was easier to record than the D-25

My D35 has a similar overall tone to the DCE1 and similar projection, but it's more balanced - the lows are nice and warm and resonate forever. The mids are much more balanced and don't get drowned out as much as with the DCE1. The highs are discernible without being overly bright. And I agree, my first thought upon strumming the D35 (other than mine!mine!mine!) was BLUES, and that suits me just fine since my acoustic playing is really just an offshoot of how I play electrics. But I might pick up something rosewood (D-50, DV-52, D-55) in the future for more of a bluegrass sound.

I haven't done (and don't plan on doing) any recording with mine so I can't add anything there. But as subjective as all of these assessments can be I'd say you summed up my thoughts on these models perfectly.

+1
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
nathanhsc said:
Just bought my first Guild! 1979 D-35! Love the sound and boy it looks great for its age. Local lutheir set the neck and did a bone nut/saddle replacement. I was also looking at an 81' d-25sb that had the same work done.
Hi Nathan WELCOME!! You should go back and get the D25 too before it gets away. You should really have a flatback AND an archback. :D That family of dreadnoughts are related in size and construction as pointed out above. In all my readings here I don't recall ever seeing any reference to specially selecting better cuts of wood for one model over another in this family. I have D25 and D40 which would be the direct comparison to the D35. A very subtle difference I've noted between the two is that the '40 has a slightly thicker neck even though the fretboard width is the same for both models. This could be simple production tolerance variation but others here have noted similar findings.
An arched back absolutely rings differently than a flat back. Other factors will come into play between any two specific guitars. My personal opinion is number of hours played is the single most important factor in developing tone. Otherwise so far my '25 which has literally about 1300 hours on it is more bell-like and has the incredible sustain mentioned by Gardman. Also, I can literally hum a note into the soundhole and the strings will sympathetically resonate without touching them at all. D40 only has about 250 hours on it and is just opening up. It takes a louder sung note just to get the soundbox humming. It IS "punchier" and more midrange balanced. A final observation: I can do flamenco AND Richie Havens power strumming on the '25, but I can't really do flamenco on the '40. Even with the exact same set up specs and strings the '40 is somehow a little stiffer in the action. I love 'em both but if I had to pick just one to live with for the rest of my life it'd be the '25.
 
Top