Dv's compared to D55

Rayk

Enlightened Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Messages
5,793
Reaction score
1,201
I have one rule with new guitars wide a$$ open !
Yeah I am aware of the differences in the two back a bit I had forgot that bluegrass had Aldi and Sitka tops

The CV-1 still gets most the play time but as of late I'm trying to share the time .
The Cv-1 some nice over tones and sustain for the little bugger she is . I'll be recording a Mellow tune with her this week I hope .

My Blueridge which you know is Aldi just rocks out but I play mostly mellow finger picking on her and I just can't get enough of that sound .

So I'd like to get my hands on a nice Guild dread if she's a good one . I have no doubt she'll fit right in with my style of playing .

But that custom build comes first once all this dust settles around me and I hope I have a tad left over for a Guild ;)
 
Last edited:

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
Also bear in mind that half (OK, slight exaggeration) the guitars Guild made were called "Bluegrass" models at one time or another! Correct me if I'm wrong, but calling certain models "Bluegrass" doesn't seem to have meant anything in terms of how they were made -- a "Bluegrass" D-40 was the same as a regular ol' D-40, right? Same with the other so-called "Bluegrass" models (how many were there?!).
Ok in '64 when the D40 and D50 were introduced, Guild's first dreadnaughts, the '40 was called the Bluegrass Jubilee and the '50 was the Bluegrass Special.
All it was at that time was a "Name" to go along with the number which Guild had been doing all along: "F50 Navarre", "F30 Aragon", "F40 Valencia"," F20 Troubador".
True, when the D25, D35 , and F-47 were introduced, they were all called "Bluegrass" too, so your humorous exaggeration's actually got some grounding in fact.
In '64 I suspect Guild was simply trying to differentiate those guitars from the original name associations to attract a different buyer.
Also Hans has confirmed that at least some very early D40's got 1-3/4 nuts and flatter fingerboards, both of which are supposed to be attractive to bluegrass fingerpickers.
At the time Flatt & Scruggs were a household name thanks to the Beverly Hillbillies.
The use of names fell off in the late '70's, but technically all D40's and D50's were "Bluegrass" models like you thought, when introduced.
So for all intents and purposes you can ignore the "Bluegrass" moniker.
NOT SINCE TACOMA!
Starting in Tacoma they revived the "Bluegrass" names on D40's and D50's and the single most important build detail was that they got ADI tops.
In fact it was historically Guild's first use of Adi tops and bracing in some models.
The sitka topped D50 was simply the D50 (or D50 Standard) and the option D40, the Richie Havens signature model, was also sitka-topped.
In New Hartford the sitka-topped versions were called the "Standards" and "Bluegrass" still meant "Adi".

Thanks guys , so I'm just rubbing my head hear , D55's brighter the D50 ? But are not the D50's considered the Bluegrass models ?
Now you know. I suspect you've never seen one of our favorite history stories that the very first D-55's were actually D50 "Specials" ordered by Tommy Smothers beginning in '64 according to Hans.
The only thing I can recall him saying for certain about those was they were D50's with an F50-style neck, ie "bling".
At that time most anything was possible and records weren't scrupulously maintained or preserved either.
Because they appeared on TV, they became known as "Television D55" and were listed as "order only" in the catalog until they finally became regular production (I think it was '74.)
There's been a LOT of speculation here about D55's getting special attention when built, like better woods, different bracing, but I can't recall any of it being confirmed by Hans or a Westerly employee.
I do know D55's got scalloped bracing at some point, (I think it shows up in the '87 price list, I think Gardman kindly pointed that out recently) and they got ebony fretboard, 3 piece necks, and AAA tops at least by close of Westerly ('01 price list). Anyway, bottom line: while it does seem reasonable to assume D55's got a lot of special attention and maybe even tap-tuned tops, I couldn't point you to concrete confirmation.
The DV's being designed for the old school sound ? Help me out here most older designs in reading and playing seem to be dryer more woody so when I read resonance that kind of made me do an about face.
Drier= more resonance but I'm sure it was more about the bracing and lightening up the backs and sides.. it's possible they did cut or sand thinner tops, example, my F65's AAA top does seem a little thinner than the D25's, but again, I've never seen that credibly confirmed.

My comments on DV details were a distillation of quotes in the '97 Guild Gallery #1 that listed the special build details for the DV-6 and the DV-52 (the only 2 in the line at the time).
A while back I realized that while they did mention sanding the backs and sides they did NOT mention sanding the tops even though they used the term "tuning the tops" in the introductory phrase.
That same Guild Gallery BTW has an article "Buildling a D55, part one" which basically only covers neck construction.
Maybe Jeff (Walrus) can check if they ever published a "part 2" covering top construction?
The first DVs originated in Westerly, then Tacoma, then MIM (Mexico). I'm not sure if they were made during the Corona-era. And be careful about the model designations (DV-4 or DV-6 that is) as the DV series never seemed cast in stone, spec-wise.
Right, no DV's in Corona, and when revived in Tacoma the '6 had a rosewood body but was 'hog in Westerly.
In Westerly the DV6 seemed to fill the slot left open by the D40 going on hiatus for a while. When it was revived the DV6 went away, just can't remember whether D40 was actually revived before close of Westerly, but definitely by Corona in 2 versions with intro of the Havens sig model.
I'd almost prefer Sitka bracing as per my Intel to Adirondack bracing tends to lessen or dull the highs and or mids .
Not sure why , seems contradictory but from what I gather Aldi tops with Aldi bracing may not be a choice tone depending what your going for .
I beleive a vid buy Mr. Collens speaks if it ?
Wish I could give credit but somebody here (TXbumper?) mentioned that because Adi's generally denser/stiffer than sitka the bracing can be made thinner/lighter for the same strength which was supposed to enhance top resonance, at least, that's why Tacoma went with all adi bracing.
Don't know if that conflicts with Collins' take since it's overall resonance vs specific frequency ranges but just puttin' it out there.
 
Last edited:

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
The one thing most Guilds have in common -- the thing that makes me a Guild fan over the other brands -- is that they're "punchy." By that I mean they have a sharp attack and a quick decay, and each string is clear. This really suits syncopated finger-style playing, at least for me. The notes don't linger in the guitar for long (often making for a muddy sound) and there's clarity between strings so I don't have to worry about hitting certain strings harder in order to make them ring out.
That's about identical to the characteristics commonly ascribed to a flatback to contrast its "sound" to an archback, speaking of which:


Occasionally I get that weird sense of the music "coming from somewhere else" on my 12-strings, but the JV72 is the only six-string where that happens, and I have more than a dozen Guild six-strings and have probably owned twice that many so I have some basis for comparison.
Is that not an archback? I just can't remember.
 
Last edited:

GardMan

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
5,367
Reaction score
975
Location
Utah
Guild Total
5
I do know D55's got scalloped bracing at some point, (I think it shows up in the '87 price list, I think Gardman kindly pointed that out recently)...
Beesley indicates that the D-50 got scalloped braces circa 1987 (discounting the short lived D-52, which essentially was a D-50 with scalloped braces made between 1983 and 1984). Scalloped braces on the D-55 appeared later... circa 1990 according to Beesley.
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
Beesley indicates that the D-50 got scalloped braces circa 1987 (discounting the short lived D-52, which essentially was a D-50 with scalloped braces made between 1983 and 1984). Scalloped braces on the D-55 appeared later... circa 1990 according to Beesley.

Thanks for correction buddy, and at least it confirms one more little build detail diff between the 2 for that period of time, at least.
 

Rayk

Enlightened Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Messages
5,793
Reaction score
1,201
Ok in '64 when the D40 and D50 were introduced, Guild's first dreadnaughts, the '40 was called the Bluegrass Jubilee and the '50 was the Bluegrass Special.
All it was at that time was a "Name" to go along with the number which Guild had been doing all along: "F50 Navarre", "F30 Aragon", "F40 Valencia"," F20 Troubador".
True, when the D25, D35 , and F-47 were introduced, they were all called "Bluegrass" too, so your humorous exaggeration's actually got some grounding in fact.
In '64 I suspect Guild was simply trying to differentiate those guitars from the original name associations to attract a different buyer.
Also Hans has confirmed that at least some very early D40's got 1-3/4 nuts and flatter fingerboards, both of which are supposed to be attractive to bluegrass fingerpickers.
At the time Flatt & Scruggs were a household name thanks to the Beverly Hillbillies.
The use of names fell off in the late '70's, but technically all D40's and D50's were "Bluegrass" models like you thought, when introduced.

NOT SINCE TACOMA!
Starting in Tacoma they revived the "Bluegrass" names on D40's and D50's and the single most important build detail was that they got ADI tops.
In fact it was historically Guild's first use of Adi tops and bracing in some models.
The sitka topped D50 was simply the D50 (or D50 Standard) and the option D40, the Richie Havens signature model, was also sitka-topped.
In New Hartford the sitka-topped versions were called the "Standards" and "Bluegrass" still meant "Adi".


Now you know. I suspect you've never seen one of our favorite history stories that the very first D-55's were actually D50 "Specials" ordered by Tommy Smothers beginning in '64 according to Hans.
The only thing I can recall him saying for certain about those was they were D50's with an F50-style neck, ie "bling".
At that time most anything was possible and records weren't scrupulously maintained or preserved either.
Because they appeared on TV, they became known as "Television D55" and were listed as "order only" in the catalog until they finally became regular production (I think it was '74.)
There's been a LOT of speculation here about D55's getting special attention when built, like better woods, different bracing, but I can't recall any of it being confirmed by Hans or a Westerly employee.
I do know D55's got scalloped bracing at some point, (I think it shows up in the '87 price list, I think Gardman kindly pointed that out recently) and they got ebony fretboard, 3 piece necks, and AAA tops at least by close of Westerly ('01 price list). Anyway, bottom line: while it does seem reasonable to assume D55's got a lot of special attention and maybe even tap-tuned tops, I couldn't point you to concrete confirmation.

Drier= more resonance but I'm sure it was more about the bracing and lightening up the backs and sides.. it's possible they did cut or sand thinner tops, example, my F65's AAA top does seem a little thinner than the D25's, but again, I've never seen that credibly confirmed.

My comments on DV details were a distillation of quotes in the '97 Guild Gallery #1 that listed the special build details for the DV-6 and the DV-52 (the only 2 in the line at the time).
A while back I realized that while they did mention sanding the backs and sides they did NOT mention sanding the tops even though they used the term "tuning the tops" in the introductory phrase.
That same Guild Gallery BTW has an article "Buildling a D55, part one" which basically only covers neck construction.
Maybe Jeff (Walrus) can check if they ever published a "part 2" covering top construction?

Right, no DV's in Corona, and when revived in Tacoma the '6 had a rosewood body but was 'hog in Westerly.
In Westerly the DV6 seemed to fill the slot left open by the D40 going on hiatus for a while. When it was revived the DV6 went away, just can't remember whether D40 was actually revived before close of Westerly, but definitely by Corona in 2 versions with intro of the Havens sig model.

Wish I could give credit but somebody here (TXbumper?) mentioned that because Adi's generally denser/stiffer than sitka the bracing can be made thinner/lighter for the same strength which was supposed to enhance top resonance, at least, that's why Tacoma went with all adi bracing.
Don't know if that conflicts with Collins' take since it's overall resonance vs specific frequency ranges but just puttin' it out there.

Wow , awesome read and facts thank you ;)
I'll look for that vid about Adi bracing .

I only passingly thought about my Blueridges bracing now I'm curious . Lol
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
The JV72 is a jumbo flatback.
I'm speculating it must be generating enough overtones at enough volume to create audible "beat frequencies":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beat_(acoustics)
Easy enough with 12 strings if just a couple aren't perfectly unison'd but as you say less common with only 6 strings.
Note down at the bottom of the article it even mentions an area of the brain which uses 'em to calculate spatial location, could explain the "sounds like it's coming from another room" effect.
Or maybe the rim was completed on Halloween like my D25 and it's just haunted.
:biggrin-new:
Ok, joking aside, very cool stuff and I could almost envy it except I get it occasionally from the D25 too. Which I attribute to the arched back.
Even heard the D40 producing a sustained harmonic tone in playback on my gf's cell phone, that I never hear when playing it myself.
This was underneath full-blown Havens style strumming.
I musta been hitting just the right chords with open strings to produce the effect, maybe kicked it off with some palm-edge muting?
 
Last edited:

Rayk

Enlightened Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Messages
5,793
Reaction score
1,201
Ok found the vid about bracing . My apologies it was not Collins but John greven

He says he would use Adi bracing to tame an Adi top where it seems Sitka would keep it to crisp or bright which is my take .
Here's the vid 2:00 min mark or so and then close to the end he mentions it .

http://youtu.be/FZcrK795u6k
 
Last edited:

Neal

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
4,870
Reaction score
1,676
Location
Charlottesville, VA
Wow, very interesting video, Ray. Really speaks to the variation in quality of different pieces of wood, even of the same species, taken from the same tree!

Here is the lesson I drew. Finding "the one" is a crapshoot. Even in the hands of a master builder, a few guitars will be exceptional, most will be good to very good, and some not so good, even when the process is highly controlled. To a significant degree, it is the hand that reaches for the next set of spruce in the stack that determines how good an instrument it will be.
 

Rayk

Enlightened Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Messages
5,793
Reaction score
1,201
Wow, very interesting video, Ray. Really speaks to the variation in quality of different pieces of wood, even of the same species, taken from the same tree!

Here is the lesson I drew. Finding "the one" is a crapshoot. Even in the hands of a master builder, a few guitars will be exceptional, most will be good to very good, and some not so good, even when the process is highly controlled. To a significant degree, it is the hand that reaches for the next set of spruce in the stack that determines how good an instrument it will be.

Yes sir let's hope the bad ones John spoke off stay off the guitar .
Now imagine mass produced .... Yikes !
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
Neal, that is exactly true. NO ONE sets out to build a mediocre or lackluster guitar. No one. And yet they happen.
Don't mean to sound snarky but I'm thinking about all those $299.00 starter and no name guitars out there, that while maybe they didn't set out to build mediocre guitars, they really didn't set out to build GOOD ones either, so that's what happens.
I'm thinking you're talking about "serious" makers though, even including the big names' branded imports.
Even Taylors... :playful:
 
Last edited:

Neal

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
4,870
Reaction score
1,676
Location
Charlottesville, VA
For any factory operation that doesn't have time to critically assess the quality of the top, the crapshoot
 

Rayk

Enlightened Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Messages
5,793
Reaction score
1,201
For any factory operation that doesn't have time to critically assess the quality of the top, the crapshoot

Yup crap shoot law of averages . Good stock hopefully good run most cases someone will by it not knowing any better .
Then if we stay at it we learn then we get better guitars lol
 
Top