I have never seen a size spec for Guild bracing for any model. I don't believe there ever was an actual "spec" due to the way they did things.A 2017 D40 Traditional and a 1999 D55. Thanks
True. No specs ever published I believe. New Hartford used CNC machines and I can only guess they transferred to Oxnard.I have never seen a size spec for Guild bracing for any model. I don't believe there ever was an actual "spec" due to the way they did things.
My memory is fading and somewhat suspect since bracing is not a real issue on non-acoustic basses but I remember they had a rectangular slab of wood. They fed it into the machine. What came out was a bunch of identical braces. They were easily separated and put into a bin for transfer to another assembly station. They were scalloped. The tour guide was "excited" because the braces were identical and thus installation was faster and the end product was more standardized. There was also excitement since making different sizes of braces was a comparatively trivial change, at least compared to cutting shaping them by hand for different models.New Hartford used CNC machines
Just open the link I posted above and you see it!My memory is fading and somewhat suspect since bracing is not a real issue on non-acoustic basses but I remember they had a rectangular slab of wood. They fed it into the machine. What came out was a bunch of identical braces. They were easily separated and put into a bin for transfer to another assembly station. They were scalloped.
Just open the link I posted above and you see it!
Ralf
Why in this everlovin' world would you need to know that?
Some people like to know where the potatoes that were used to make their French fries came from.
Was striving for a humorous analogy. That said, however there is a thread (you can look yourself) that is discussing the possibility that larger than necessary braces were used on some Westerly Collection acoustics in order to deaden the top and make them less competitive with Oxnard made instruments with similar specs. So size may matter to someone.Don't see that at comparable Mr Five Guys! What kind of wood maybe, scalloped maybe, but .375" vs .380"?
Well I guess that is a thing then.That said, however there is a thread (you can look yourself) that is discussing the possibility that larger than necessary braces were used on some Westerly Collection acoustics in order to deaden the top and make them less competitive with Oxnard made instruments with similar specs.
I remember those days!people would walk into a store, play guitars, and pick the one they liked.
Industrial espionage.Why in this everlovin' world would you need to know that?
I laugh, but that's a real thing.Industrial espionage.
Fro, not sure if we were in the same tour group, but I remember Darren telling us that they only used the brace cutter CNC machine sporadically because the shop didn't make enough guitars to put it into frequent use.
Darrin Wallace, my tour guide.
Once upon a time, in a Galaxy far, far away, people would walk into a store, play guitars, and pick the one they liked. Then I first heard the words scalloped bracing, when the new HD 28 came out. It's been downhill ever since. Why would you need to know a guitar had adirondak bracing? You'd hear it as liking the guitar better. Or you'd like sitka bracing better. Your ears and not marketing hype would tell you.
A friend recently called me in a tizzy. He bought two 000 18s with the intention of sending one back. One was a stock 000 18, the other had hide glue, adirondak bracing, and some cosmetic upgrades. He by far liked the stock 000 18 better, but was so freaked out about liking the much cheaper guitar. Thought there must be something wrong with him. I had to slap some sense into him. It's indicative of how far marketing has come in getting you to doubt your own senses.