So did Guild ever send cease and desist letters to the Japanese manufacturers that we’re making copies?

Rambozo96

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2020
Messages
1,659
Reaction score
1,192
Location
Texas
Guild Total
5
We all hear about Gibson and possibly Martin going after Ibanez/Takamine/etc but did Guild ever take legal action against Takamine? I know Ibanez made a few Guild copies but it seems like Takamine was making more of them.
 

chazmo

Super Moderator
Gold Supporting
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
26,271
Reaction score
7,608
Location
Central Massachusetts
I doubt it, Rambozo, but I also have no idea. It's certainly possible that other legal threats were made, but as Bob said, the only actual lawsuit that I'm aware of was Norlin (Gibson) vs. Hoshino (Ibanez):

On June 28th, 1977, Norlin, the parent company of Gibson, filed a lawsuit against Elger (Ibanez) in Philadelphia Federal District Court. The case was “Gibson Vs. Elger Co.,” with Gibson claiming trademark infringement based on the duplicate 'open book' headstock design of the Ibanez copies.
 

walrus

Reverential Member
Gold Supporting
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
24,044
Reaction score
8,123
Location
Massachusetts
Only Gibson actually pursued a lawsuit, and only against Ibanez.

Of course, they've gone after other manufacturers, particularly a pretty aggressive fight with PRS.

Here's an interesting article about some miscellaneous gear lawsuits:


walrus
 

Guildedagain

Enlightened Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
9,105
Reaction score
7,266
Location
The Evergreen State
Blatant copies are stronger than ever, used to be Jay Turser, now Harley Benton (a cross between a legendary cycle maker and a famous pinup of yore?) and they only serve to feed the GAS for the real thing, to wit so many posts like;

"I got a Harley Benton, had the neck straightened, frets leveled and trimmed, a proper nut installed, switched out the pickups and pots, and the hardware for Tone Pros, but now I have to have the real thing", usually a Les Paul.

So these copy guitars serve two purposes, to keep luthiers and the aftermarket parts industry in business, and as GAS for the guitars they're trying to copy, because you can't be a rock star sporting a Harley Benton, when it comes to headstock logos, "Only Gibson is good enough".
 

adorshki

Reverential Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
34,176
Reaction score
6,800
Location
Sillycon Valley CA
Blatant copies are stronger than ever, used to be Jay Turser, now Harley Benton (a cross between a legendary cycle maker and a famous pinup of yore?) and they only serve to feed the GAS for the real thing, to wit so many posts like;

"I got a Harley Benton, had the neck straightened, frets leveled and trimmed, a proper nut installed, switched out the pickups and pots, and the hardware for Tone Pros, but now I have to have the real thing", usually a Les Paul.

So these copy guitars serve two purposes, to keep luthiers and the aftermarket parts industry in business, and as GAS for the guitars they're trying to copy, because you can't be a rock star sporting a Harley Benton, when it comes to headstock logos, "Only Gibson is good enough".
"Harley Benton: Available only through FB Marketplace."
 
Top