Rambozo96
Senior Member
We all hear about Gibson and possibly Martin going after Ibanez/Takamine/etc but did Guild ever take legal action against Takamine? I know Ibanez made a few Guild copies but it seems like Takamine was making more of them.
Autospell. Killing spellcheck, one word at a time.We're? It's were.
I figured if anybody'd know if they did, you would. Were they even on Guild's radar or were there things like cost (legal) vs benefit (potential recovered sales) issues?We're? It's were.
Only Gibson actually pursued a lawsuit, and only against Ibanez.
They didn't when I was there. Guild was usually under the radar, as was mentioned.I figured if anybody'd know if they did, you would. Were they even on Guild's radar or were there things like cost (legal) vs benefit (potential recovered sales) issues?
Thought we got AutoCorrupt a couple years back?Autospell. Killing spellcheck, one word at a time.
"Harley Benton: Available only through FB Marketplace."Blatant copies are stronger than ever, used to be Jay Turser, now Harley Benton (a cross between a legendary cycle maker and a famous pinup of yore?) and they only serve to feed the GAS for the real thing, to wit so many posts like;
"I got a Harley Benton, had the neck straightened, frets leveled and trimmed, a proper nut installed, switched out the pickups and pots, and the hardware for Tone Pros, but now I have to have the real thing", usually a Les Paul.
So these copy guitars serve two purposes, to keep luthiers and the aftermarket parts industry in business, and as GAS for the guitars they're trying to copy, because you can't be a rock star sporting a Harley Benton, when it comes to headstock logos, "Only Gibson is good enough".