HoboKen
Member
OK....I'll bite on this one.......all said here so far are points well made by all.
I've heard & played badly built guitars , even factory seconds that sounded pretty good. I've heard & played well made guitars that sounded just "so-so." I would not spend serious money to buy either catagory of guitar, no matter what the headstock says it is! Gibson, Martin, Taylor & Guild have all built good guitars and even some great guitars.
Here is my selection criteria in order of approach.....
1. Are the woods selected of high quality - tight streight grain, etc.? If yes, I move to .....
2. Is the design of the guitar condusive to good play-ability and sound creation? (does it fit me! ) If so, I move to.....
3. Is this one guitar well built? If not, it's not going to hold up to what the design intended it to do.
4. Good wood, fits me (plays well & easy), well constructed (quality control), ....does it have a balance of sound I want for the specific music I wll use it to play? (what are my ears telling me!)
5. Is the price reasonable for the full quality of the product purchased?
6. If a new guitar, does the company really back its warantee?
If all fits, I may buy it!
Martins......I like Martins for Bluegrass with the high treble- lonesome sound. I've never seen a Martin that was not well constructed. Untill recently I've never seen a Martin with a poor quality of the wood selected. I've only found a few that had real ease of playing and great sound....I bought them! (an HD-28, a D-35, and a 0001R......I still have the 0001R)
Taylors......I've only seen a few under $3 to 4K that even got past the wood issue. Sorry! But it's true. I've only seen a very few that could get past the design and build issues regardless of price. I've never seen a one that was worth the money required to purchase it.
Gibsons.....I've owned and played four of 'em. Except for a few from the Custom Shop in Montana, I have never found a newer one to go up the scale to the issue of price. I've never found a newer one that made it past the price. (I still have my '65 Kalamazoo Gibson-Epiphone Texan.
My one firend who has Guild JF-55, also has his old "66 Kalamazoo Gibson-Epiphone Frontier)
Guilds......I've played an acoustic Westerly dreadnought Guild that was so heavy that I could not comfortably play it for even five minutes. It was well made and sounded good....but it "was" a tank! I've seen Guild factory seconds that I would not buy.....not as well constructed or finished to a lesser or greater degree. But! .....my Guilds are the only guitars I've found to get all the way up the 6-stage scale and get me to buy them. They are Hobokens & Westerlys. They replaced the Martins because they not only can do the high - lonseome sound, but can also provide great bass! They simply are better balanced tone-wise for a wider range of a variety of music.....and like Martin, the Westerly factory really cared about its warantee to the original owner.
The only issue I am concerned about is that for those of use who purchased a Hoboken or Westerly Guild, will Fender honor the guarantee to the original owner?? I have a letter from Fender saying yes. However, I've been waiting over 8 months now for the Fender-Guild custom shop to
even let me send a prised Guild back to them for warantee work verified as being needed by a Fender-Guild authorized field rep. I'm getting great lip service, but one has to ask.....if this was the only guitar you owned, and you have been waiting 8 months just to send it for warantee repair work, what would your attitude towards Fender's stewardship of the Guild name be? It goes down hill each day I wait.
I've heard & played badly built guitars , even factory seconds that sounded pretty good. I've heard & played well made guitars that sounded just "so-so." I would not spend serious money to buy either catagory of guitar, no matter what the headstock says it is! Gibson, Martin, Taylor & Guild have all built good guitars and even some great guitars.
Here is my selection criteria in order of approach.....
1. Are the woods selected of high quality - tight streight grain, etc.? If yes, I move to .....
2. Is the design of the guitar condusive to good play-ability and sound creation? (does it fit me! ) If so, I move to.....
3. Is this one guitar well built? If not, it's not going to hold up to what the design intended it to do.
4. Good wood, fits me (plays well & easy), well constructed (quality control), ....does it have a balance of sound I want for the specific music I wll use it to play? (what are my ears telling me!)
5. Is the price reasonable for the full quality of the product purchased?
6. If a new guitar, does the company really back its warantee?
If all fits, I may buy it!
Martins......I like Martins for Bluegrass with the high treble- lonesome sound. I've never seen a Martin that was not well constructed. Untill recently I've never seen a Martin with a poor quality of the wood selected. I've only found a few that had real ease of playing and great sound....I bought them! (an HD-28, a D-35, and a 0001R......I still have the 0001R)
Taylors......I've only seen a few under $3 to 4K that even got past the wood issue. Sorry! But it's true. I've only seen a very few that could get past the design and build issues regardless of price. I've never seen a one that was worth the money required to purchase it.
Gibsons.....I've owned and played four of 'em. Except for a few from the Custom Shop in Montana, I have never found a newer one to go up the scale to the issue of price. I've never found a newer one that made it past the price. (I still have my '65 Kalamazoo Gibson-Epiphone Texan.
My one firend who has Guild JF-55, also has his old "66 Kalamazoo Gibson-Epiphone Frontier)
Guilds......I've played an acoustic Westerly dreadnought Guild that was so heavy that I could not comfortably play it for even five minutes. It was well made and sounded good....but it "was" a tank! I've seen Guild factory seconds that I would not buy.....not as well constructed or finished to a lesser or greater degree. But! .....my Guilds are the only guitars I've found to get all the way up the 6-stage scale and get me to buy them. They are Hobokens & Westerlys. They replaced the Martins because they not only can do the high - lonseome sound, but can also provide great bass! They simply are better balanced tone-wise for a wider range of a variety of music.....and like Martin, the Westerly factory really cared about its warantee to the original owner.
The only issue I am concerned about is that for those of use who purchased a Hoboken or Westerly Guild, will Fender honor the guarantee to the original owner?? I have a letter from Fender saying yes. However, I've been waiting over 8 months now for the Fender-Guild custom shop to
even let me send a prised Guild back to them for warantee work verified as being needed by a Fender-Guild authorized field rep. I'm getting great lip service, but one has to ask.....if this was the only guitar you owned, and you have been waiting 8 months just to send it for warantee repair work, what would your attitude towards Fender's stewardship of the Guild name be? It goes down hill each day I wait.