Tell Me what you really think of the New GAD'S !

HoboKen

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
443
Reaction score
0
Location
Central PA
Good points California!

Since getting my ole '67 Martin D-35 back this past year (traded it for a VW to a friend back in '70 and when he passed on last year, I bought it back from his daughter), I've compaired it to a number of newer Martins and it hurts to have to say the Saga Blueridge BR-160 I won two years ago at a local Bluegrass Music Assoc. Picnic came closer to my old D-35 in the quality of woods, tone, etc. than a bunch of newer D-41s, D-45s, & HD-28s. The Br-160 is Chinese all solid wood copy of a pre-war HD-28 that sold two years ago for less than $500 w/arched top hardshell case. I don't know if it just happens to be a one-of-a-kind great guitar, but it even out-did my son's Guild GAD 50.....except for the bottom end tones. There it just matches the GAD 50. A few months ago I saw at GC a regular Martin D-28 that had a sub-par knothole quality spruce top. I could not believe my eyes that a less than "A" level top was on a Martin D-28! And they had it in the glass case area as if it were something special!! No price break on this one either, "after all its a Martin".....at $2200.

I do agree the GADS for the money are a great entry level guitar. Now that the Blueridge BRs are going up so much in price due to the demand out-stripping the supply amongst the Bluegrass folks.

My son likes his GAD 50. And as I told one young man who just made Sgt. with the Army and who will be traveling wolrd-wide with his ax. Finding a left-hand guitar of any quality is hard sometimes. And for the money a GAD 50L is a very good buy. If something happens to it, even with a hardshell case, you will not cry as much as you would to see something happen to say a D-55. He will most likely keep his GAD 50, much like I've kept my Kalamazoo Epi. Texan and later buy a Guild D-55.

Lets see...... I paid new about $500 for My Martin D-35 back in '67, about $365 for my Guild F-212, and $285 for my Epi. FT-79N Texan that year.....all with hardshell cases. Here we are 40 years later and you can still buy an all solid wood guitar of good quality w/hardshell case in about the $500 to $700 range. Granted its not Brazillian rosewood or top quality mahogany like back then, but when you consider what quality back then you could find in a guitar costing 1/5th to 1/4th to 1/3rd the price of a real quality guitar.....well there just were not many to be found back then! If you did find one at that price, most likely it was plywood. I don't mean mahogany, maple or rosewood plyed-wood. I mean pine plywood with a sprayed-on grain finish and a black painted fret board! Can you say "Silvertone" or "Stella" boys and girls! My first real guitar (well after my Gene Autry plastic one and the Stella plywood one) was a Harmony Golden Soverign.......never could get the neck to stay streight.

Oh well, '67 was a good year..... '67 was the year I also bought a prestine '63 Corvette Split-Rear Window Coupe for $2600 total! Oh to have that one back now!

Well, enough of this old geezer's ramblings for one day.

HoboKen
 

Siwash

Member
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
343
Reaction score
0
You know, in all this, I'm getting more and more curious about American rates of participation in playing guitar.

Are there more players than 10 years ago (I heard the 1980s were bad years for guitar sales)? Is guitar more popular?

I have to guess that guitar sales are tied to some extent to popular music, which lately has not been too guitar-focused. On the other hand, there simply are more people in toto than 10 years ago, so perhaps more guitar players.

Anyone know?

re: BR 160 Blueridge. Very nice guitar; great sound. I still feel the tuners are lousy and need immediate replacement; headstock is strangely small. I like the bling, though.

re: GAD 50. In turning this over, I suppose it would have made more sense for Fender to have reserved the Chesterfield logo for American guitars, just used the step-ladder Guild name at the top. I don't care much for the retro Guild script on the new CO-CV line. The new Guild shield is just okay, not too glaringly against the style.
 

california

Gone But Not Forgotten
Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles
HoboKen said:
Good points California!

... it hurts to have to say the Saga Blueridge BR-160 I won two years ago at a local Bluegrass Music Assoc. Picnic came closer to my old D-35 in the quality of woods, tone, etc. than a bunch of newer D-41s, D-45s, & HD-28s. The Br-160 is Chinese all solid wood copy of a pre-war HD-28 that sold two years ago for less than $500 w/arched top hardshell case. I don't know if it just happens to be a one-of-a-kind great guitar, but it even out-did my son's Guild GAD 50.....except for the bottom end tones.
HoboKen

The guy who sold me my X-175 used the proceeds to by a Blueridge, after turning down a DV-52 that I offered him in trade. To me, the Blueridge is no DV-52, but he loves it, but after hearing and seeing it, it really was a very good value.
 

Metalman

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Messages
671
Reaction score
4
Location
NYC
What do you think about the GADs

Siwash said:
re: BR 160 Blueridge. Very nice guitar; great sound. I still feel the tuners are lousy and need immediate replacement; headstock is strangely small. I like the bling, though.

I checked out a Blueridge BR 160 a while back. Mandolin Bros. had just one, plus in their "upscale" room, a couple of pre-war Martin D-28s, each going for about $18,000. The Blueridge, about $895.
I took the BR 160 into the room with the Martin, played them side-by-side, went back and forth, and you know what . . .there was not a lot of difference between the two! I couldn't believe it.
Yes, the tuners were cheesy, but that can be changed out in minutes, and the sound, okay, it wasn't quite as pure as the Martin, but it was pretty darn close.
Seems the Blueridge has nailed that loud vintage tone pretty well.
Not going to run out and buy one though.

Metalman
 
Top